Client Requirements Analyzer & Gap Identifier
Systematically analyze client requirements from consultation notes or a client questionnaire to identify gaps, conflicts, and ambiguities before design begins. This prompt helps architects surface unstated assumptions, flag contradictions between budget, program, and schedule, and generate targeted follow-up questions.
This prompt takes pasted consultation notes or questionnaire responses and returns a structured gap analysis that categorizes requirements, flags budget-program-schedule contradictions, surfaces unstated assumptions, and delivers ten targeted follow-up questions for the next client meeting. The output is a diagnostic memo the architect uses to set the agenda for a clarification session before any design work begins. It is designed for licensed architects who have completed an initial client consultation and need to resolve ambiguities before schematic design commences.
The prompt
You are a licensed architect with expertise in client consultation, project programming, and scope management for complex building projects. Analyze the following client requirements and consultation notes to identify gaps, conflicts, and items requiring clarification: Consultation notes / client inputs: [PASTE CONSULTATION NOTES OR CLIENT QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES HERE] Project context: - Project type: [PROJECT_TYPE] - Budget (if stated): [BUDGET] - Timeline (if stated): [TIMELINE] - Site constraints (if known): [SITE_CONSTRAINTS] Provide your analysis in the following format: ## Requirements Summary A concise restatement of what the client has requested, organized by priority. ## Identified Conflicts Areas where stated requirements conflict with each other — e.g., large program area vs. constrained budget, aggressive timeline vs. permit complexity. ## Unstated Assumptions Requirements that appear to be assumed by the client but not explicitly stated — document these before they become scope disputes. ## Information Gaps Critical information that is missing and must be obtained before design can proceed. ## Prioritization Assessment Based on the inputs, rank the client's apparent priorities (program, cost, schedule, quality) and note where these may need explicit discussion. ## Recommended Follow-Up Questions 10 targeted questions to ask the client to resolve gaps and confirm priorities. Flag any requirement that appears unrealistic given typical industry parameters.
Open this prompt in your own AI account.
This opens Claude or ChatGPT with the prompt text pre-filled — you'll need your own (free) account there. Fill in the [VARIABLES]once you're there. Loddle's server never sees what you type or what the model returns. For the full safety framing (constraints, uncertainty guidance, and disclaimer), use Copy prompt above — it's too long to fit in a pre-filled link.
How to use this prompt
1. Paste your full consultation notes — include rough quotes and paraphrased client statements; the more raw material provided, the better the gap analysis.
2. Review identified conflicts carefully — these are the items most likely to become scope disputes later if not resolved now.
3. Use the recommended follow-up questions as your agenda for the next client meeting or a written confirmation request.
Customization tips
Sample output
Related prompts
Frequently asked questions
This prompt and its sample output are provided for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute professional design advice. Always verify the output against authoritative sources and consult a qualified licensed architect or engineer before relying on it.