Contractors

Constructability Review Checklist

Conduct a systematic constructability review of design documents to identify conflicts, sequencing challenges, missing information, and opportunities to improve buildability before construction begins.

This prompt generates a structured constructability review checklist organized across six categories — drawing coordination conflicts, construction sequencing and phasing feasibility, site access and logistics constraints, MEP and trade coordination space conflicts, specification and material availability review, and code and regulatory compliance hold points. For each issue identified, the output records a description, drawing reference, risk level (High / Medium / Low based on cost and schedule impact), recommended action, and responsible party — formatted for submission to the design team through the formal RFI or design review comment process to create an official record. It is for general contractors and construction managers conducting preconstruction reviews on projects at 50% design development through 100% construction documents.

Testedclaude-sonnet-4-6ValidatedMar 2026ScopeAll issues must reference specific drawing sheets, specifica…TierAdvanced
AI Role
You are an experienced construction manager and project superintendent with deep…
Models
Claude
Confidence
Advanced
Constraints
All issues must reference specific drawing sheets, specification sections, or contract documents where applicable
Risk levels must be assigned based on potential cost and schedule impact, not subjective preference
Recommendations must be actionable and clearly assigned to a responsible party
Review must acknowledge limitations of available information — incomplete documents produce incomplete reviews
Never characterize design professional work as negligent — frame issues as coordination opportunities
Tested Models
claude-sonnet-4-6
Uncertainty
If project type or document set is unclear, note which checklist sections require additional information and flag items marked [REQUIRES DRAWING REVIEW] for manual completion by project team.
Last updated
2026-05-28Published

The prompt

2,111 characters
constructability-review-checklist.prompt
You are an experienced construction manager and project superintendent with deep expertise in identifying design issues that create field problems. You have extensive experience conducting preconstruction reviews that save time and money during construction.

Conduct a constructability review for the following project:

Project Type: [BUILDING_TYPE/PROJECT_TYPE]
Construction Delivery Method: [GC/CM-AT-RISK/DESIGN-BUILD/OTHER]
Project Phase: [DESIGN DEVELOPMENT/CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS/100% CD]
Key Concerns Identified: [ANY_KNOWN_ISSUES]
Project Complexity Level: [LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH]
Special Systems or Features: [SPECIAL_SYSTEMS]
Site Constraints: [SITE_CONSTRAINTS]
Project Schedule Pressure Points: [SCHEDULE_CONCERNS]

Generate a comprehensive constructability review checklist covering:

1. DRAWING COORDINATION
   - Architectural vs. structural conflicts
   - MEP coordination issues
   - Dimensional inconsistencies between drawings
   - Missing details or unclear specifications

2. SEQUENCING AND PHASING
   - Construction sequencing feasibility
   - Long-lead material and equipment identification
   - Phasing conflicts with operations (occupied buildings)
   - Weather and seasonal construction considerations

3. ACCESS AND LOGISTICS
   - Site access limitations
   - Material delivery and staging constraints
   - Crane and equipment placement
   - Worker access and safety

4. TRADE COORDINATION
   - Mechanical, electrical, plumbing space conflicts
   - Structural penetrations and sleeves
   - Fire protection system routing
   - Coordination with specialty subcontractors

5. SPECIFICATION AND MATERIAL REVIEW
   - Proprietary specifications that limit competition
   - Availability of specified materials
   - Lead time for special equipment
   - Substitution opportunities

6. CODE AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
   - Permit requirements and timeline
   - Inspection hold points
   - Special inspection requirements
   - ADA and accessibility compliance

For each issue identified, provide: Description, Drawing Reference, Risk Level (High/Medium/Low), Recommended Action, and Responsible Party.
WAITLIST

Runner beta coming — join the waitlist.

In-product execution isn't live yet. Leave your email and we'll let you know if the Runner beta opens.

How to use this prompt

1

Input your project type and known concerns, then work through each checklist category systematically against your actual drawing set

2

Assign team members to review specific trade packages and consolidate findings into the output format for submission to the design team.

Customization tips

Add project-specific checklist items based on the unique features or constraints of your project
Weight risk levels based on your firm's experience with similar project types
Include photo documentation references for site-based constraints
Customize the responsible party column to match your project organizational chart

Sample output

Mar 2026Advanced
Constructability Review Checklist — Commercial Restaurant Build-Out Project: [Project Name] Design Stage: [Schematic / Design Development / Construction Documents — 50% / 100%] Review Date: [Date] Reviewed by: [Superintendent + Project Manager] PURPOSE: Identify design, coordination, and constructability issues in the construction documents before bid or construction, when changes are least expensive. ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS: [ ] Floor plans reviewed at all levels — no conflicts between partition locations and structural elements [ ] Door schedules complete — hardware, frame type, fire rating, width confirmed for all openings [ ] Ceiling heights confirmed achievable given structural depth, ductwork, and lighting conditions [ ] Reflected ceiling plans coordinated with HVAC, sprinkler, and lighting (no conflicts at plan overlay) [ ] Finish schedule references — all finish materials specified, no open specification items [ ] Detail drawings provided for all complex conditions (transitions, custom millwork, sill conditions) Issues identified: ___________ STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS: [ ] Column locations confirmed — no conflicts with kitchen equipment layout or partition plan [ ] Floor penetrations for mechanical, electrical, and plumbing equipment — penetrations located and sized on structural drawings or clearly noted as contractor-located [ ] Slab depressions for kitchen floor drains and recessed equipment — shown on structural drawings [ ] Roof loading — HVAC units and exhaust fans reviewed against roof structural capacity Issues identified: ___________ MECHANICAL DRAWINGS: [ ] Kitchen exhaust system: hood locations shown, duct routing to exterior shown, makeup air unit shown [ ] HVAC duct routing shown in ceiling cavities — clearance verified against ceiling height [ ] Grease duct clearances to combustibles indicated and achievable given building geometry [ ] Equipment schedule complete — all equipment sized and specified Issues identified: ___________ PLUMBING DRAWINGS: [ ] Grease interceptor shown — location, size, and access shown [ ] Floor drain locations in kitchen and service areas coordinated with equipment layout [ ] Restroom layout — vent routing through partition/ceiling shown [ ] Hot water heater — sized and location shown with clearances Issues identified: ___________ ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS: [ ] Service capacity confirmed — panel schedule load calculation complete [ ] Kitchen equipment electrical connections shown and coordinated with equipment schedule [ ] Lighting fixture schedule complete — no TBD items [ ] Emergency egress lighting and exit signs shown at all required locations Issues identified: ___________ HIGH-PRIORITY ITEMS REQUIRING RESOLUTION BEFORE BIDDING/CONSTRUCTION: [List all identified issues with recommended resolution]

Related prompts

Frequently asked questions

Read the Contractors AI Guide
Professional Disclaimer

This constructability review template is a general guideline for identifying potential construction challenges. All technical findings must be verified by qualified construction professionals against actual project documents. Coordination issues should be formally documented and submitted to the design team through the RFI process. Consult contract documents for responsibilities and obligations.