Lawyers

Speaking Engagement Proposal Drafter

Draft a professional speaking proposal for bar association events, industry conferences, CLE programs, or trade association meetings. Speaking engagements are among the highest-credibility business development activities for attorneys — this prompt helps you craft a compelling proposal that event organizers will accept.

Drafts a complete speaking proposal package — with three title options in different registers (factual, provocative, and question-based), a 100-150 word session description written for event program listings, a timeliness hook explaining why this topic is specifically urgent now, a structured four-to-six section session outline, a tailored speaker bio emphasizing credentials most relevant to this topic and audience, three to five specific actionable audience takeaways, and a two-to-three sentence organizer pitch. The output is a submission-ready proposal the attorney sends directly to event selection committees without additional formatting. Built for attorneys seeking speaking opportunities at bar events, industry conferences, or CLE programs who want a professionally structured proposal that emphasizes timeliness and audience value — addressing the most common proposal failure of leading with credentials rather than demonstrating why this topic matters to this audience right now.

Testedclaude-sonnet-4-6ValidatedMar 2026ScopeThis is informational only, not legal advice. Recommend cons…TierProfessional
AI Role
You are a legal business development consultant with 10+ years of experience hel…
Models
Claude
Confidence
Professional
Constraints
This is informational only, not legal advice. Recommend consulting a licensed attorney for specific matters.
Do not fabricate credentials, publications, or prior speaking engagements in the speaker bio.
CLE-accredited presentations have specific content requirements — verify CLE approval process with the sponsoring organization.
Presentations to non-lawyer audiences must be clear that they are educational, not legal advice.
Tested Models
claude-sonnet-4-6
Uncertainty
If information is ambiguous, incomplete, or the information falls outside the specified scope, clearly state your assumptions and recommend professional review.
Jurisdiction
US-general
Last updated
2026-05-28Published

The prompt

1,909 characters
speaking-engagement-proposal.prompt
You are a legal business development consultant with 10+ years of experience helping attorneys win speaking engagements.

Draft a speaking proposal for the following:

Attorney/Presenter: [ATTORNEY NAME AND ROLE]
Proposed Topic: [DESCRIBE THE TOPIC — be as specific as possible]
Target Event/Audience: [DESCRIBE THE EVENT AND AUDIENCE — e.g., 'State bar annual conference, 300 attendees, general practice attorneys', 'Manufacturing industry association, 200 mid-market CFOs and GCs', 'CLE provider webinar series, 500+ attorney attendees']
Event Format: [IN-PERSON KEYNOTE / PANEL / CLE WEBINAR / BREAKOUT SESSION — specify]
Proposed Duration: [LENGTH — e.g., 30 min, 60 min CLE, 90 min workshop]
Co-Presenter (if any): [NAME AND ROLE — or 'Solo presentation']
Timely Hook: [WHY THIS TOPIC IS RELEVANT NOW — recent case law, regulatory change, industry trend]
Attorney's Credentials on Topic: [EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE THAT QUALIFIES THEM TO SPEAK]
Learning Outcomes: [WHAT ATTENDEES WILL KNOW OR BE ABLE TO DO AFTER THE PRESENTATION]

Create the speaking proposal with:

## Proposed Session Title
3 title options: one factual, one provocative, one question-based.

## Session Description (100-150 words)
The session summary as it would appear in the event program — compelling to attendees, not just to the organizer.

## Why Now: Timeliness Hook
The specific development, case, regulation, or trend that makes this topic urgent for this audience right now.

## Session Outline
A structured 4-6 section outline showing the content the presenter will cover.

## Speaker Bio (150-200 words)
A tailored speaker bio emphasizing the credentials most relevant to this topic and audience.

## Practical Takeaways for Attendees
3-5 specific, actionable things attendees will leave with.

## Organizer Pitch Note
A 2-3 sentence pitch to the event organizer explaining why this session is a strong fit for their event.
WAITLIST

Runner beta coming — join the waitlist.

In-product execution isn't live yet. Leave your email and we'll let you know if the Runner beta opens.

How to use this prompt

1

1. Be specific about the audience — a CLE for general practice attorneys requires different framing than a presentation for in-house counsel in a specific industry.

2

2. Choose your topic based on genuine expertise, not what seems like it would be popular — event organizers can tell the difference.

3

3. Use the three title options and test with colleagues before submitting — title selection significantly affects attendee registration.

Customization tips

Add 'Include a handout outline that attendees can keep after the presentation' to improve the proposal's perceived value.
Specify 'This is for a CLE credit submission — include the applicable MCLE learning objectives in the required format.'
Add 'Include a slide deck outline with a suggested number of slides for the presentation' to make the proposal more concrete.
For panel proposals, add 'Include suggested co-panelists by title or role who would add diverse perspective to the discussion.'

Sample output

Mar 2026Professional
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENT PROPOSAL FRAMEWORK — Technology Employment Law Topics CONTEXT: Boutique employment law firm seeking to establish thought leadership in the technology sector through conference and association speaking engagements. PROPOSAL STRUCTURE: HEADER INFORMATION: Proposed Speaker: [Attorney Name], [Title], [Firm Name] Practice Focus: Employment law for technology employers CLE Credit Requested: [X.X] hours (specify if ethics credit is available for any session) PROPOSED SESSION OPTIONS (present 2-3 options to the program committee): OPTION A — "The Employment Law Risks Every Tech Founder Should Know Before Their First Hire" Format: 45-minute presentation + 15-minute Q&A Audience: Early-stage founders, HR leads at seed-to-Series B companies Content: Classification of founders and early employees, at-will employment misunderstandings, equity compensation basics, first employment policies that protect the company Why this session: Founders often take their first major employment law hit between 10-50 employees — before they have in-house counsel. This session addresses the gap. OPTION B — "Non-Compete and Trade Secret Protection for Technology Companies: What Works in 2026" Format: 60-minute presentation + Q&A Audience: General Counsel, HR Directors, senior management Content: Non-compete enforceability state-by-state, what courts actually enforce, trade secret protection as the more reliable alternative, remote workforce complications Why this session: The legal landscape shifted significantly in 2024-2026. Practitioners need updated guidance grounded in current outcomes. OPTION C — "RIF Done Right: WARN Act Compliance and Severance Strategy for Technology Employers" Format: 45-minute presentation Audience: HR Directors, CFOs, General Counsel at companies undergoing restructuring Content: WARN Act applicability thresholds, state mini-WARN acts, severance package design, OWBPA compliance for older worker releases, communication sequencing Why this session: Technology sector has seen significant restructuring. Practical guidance on compliant RIF execution is in high demand. SPEAKER BACKGROUND SUMMARY: [2-3 sentences on attorney's relevant experience, any prior speaking engagements, and specific expertise in the technology sector] MATERIALS OFFERED: Written outline, slide deck, and participant handout for approved session. Willing to adapt content to the specific audience profile and event format. Note: Speaking proposal language should be customized to each event and reviewed for accuracy before submission. This framework is informational only.

Related prompts

Frequently asked questions

Read the Lawyers AI Guide
Professional Disclaimer

This AI-generated content is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Always consult a licensed attorney for specific legal matters.