Lawyers

Opening Statement Outline Builder

Build a compelling opening statement framework — from the case theory narrative to the preview of evidence and closing theme. An effective opening statement tells the jury your client's story in a way that frames how they receive all subsequent evidence, making it one of the most important moments of any trial.

Builds a complete opening statement outline — including a resonant case theme statement, a concrete opening hook designed to capture attention in the first 60 seconds without defaulting to a generic introduction, a chronological narrative arc with a beginning, middle, and end, evidence preview notes for each key exhibit and witness, an inoculation section to proactively undercut the opposing theory, and a specific call to action close. The output is a structural framework the attorney delivers from — not a verbatim script — with notes on delivery and time management calibrated to the specified time limit and jury or bench trial context. Intended for trial attorneys preparing for any civil jury or bench trial who need a persuasive, coherent narrative structure established before rehearsal begins.

Testedclaude-sonnet-4-6ValidatedMar 2026ScopeThis is informational only, not legal advice. Recommend cons…TierProfessional
AI Role
You are a trial attorney with 15+ years of jury trial experience, specializing i…
Models
Claude
Confidence
Professional
Constraints
This is informational only, not legal advice. Recommend consulting a licensed attorney for specific matters.
Opening statements must reference only evidence that will actually be introduced at trial — promising evidence that does not materialize is reversible error and damages credibility.
Do not misrepresent the evidence or opposing party's position — opening statements must be truthful.
All specific claims in the opening statement must be supportable by admissible evidence — verify admissibility before finalizing.
Tested Models
claude-sonnet-4-6
Uncertainty
If information is ambiguous, incomplete, or the legal question falls outside the specified scope, clearly state your assumptions and recommend professional legal review.
Jurisdiction
US-general
Last updated
2026-05-28Published

The prompt

2,090 characters
opening-statement-outliner.prompt
You are a trial attorney with 15+ years of jury trial experience and expertise in crafting persuasive case narratives.

Create an opening statement outline for the following case:

Case Type: [TYPE OF CASE — e.g., 'Breach of commercial lease agreement', 'Employment wrongful termination', 'Business fraud']
Your Client's Position: [PLAINTIFF / DEFENDANT]
Case Theory (Your Narrative): [THE STORY YOU ARE TELLING — in 2-3 sentences, as if explaining to a non-lawyer]
Key Facts That Support Your Theory: [THE MOST IMPORTANT FAVORABLE FACTS]
Key Evidence You Will Introduce: [DOCUMENTS, WITNESSES, EXHIBITS YOU WILL REFERENCE]
Theme Phrase: [A SHORT, MEMORABLE PHRASE THAT CAPTURES YOUR CASE — or 'Help me develop one']
Anticipated Defense/Plaintiff Theory: [WHAT THE OTHER SIDE WILL SAY]
Jury Demographics (if known): [ANY RELEVANT INFORMATION ABOUT LIKELY JURORS — or 'Unknown']
Time Limit: [TIME ALLOTTED FOR OPENING STATEMENT]

Create the opening statement outline with:

## Theme Statement
A 1-2 sentence case theme that will resonate with jurors and anchor the narrative throughout trial.

## Opening Hook (first 60 seconds)
A compelling, concrete opening that captures attention — could be a key fact, a telling document quote, or a scene-setting description. Avoid 'Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I represent...' openings.

## Case Narrative
A chronological narrative outline organized as a story — with a beginning (background/setup), middle (the dispute and events), and end (the harm caused and what justice requires). Use active voice and concrete details.

## Evidence Preview
For each piece of key evidence: what it is, why it matters, and the one thing the jury should remember about it.

## Inoculation Against Opposition Theory
How to briefly acknowledge and undercut the anticipated opposing theory — do this proactively to take the sting out.

## Call to Action Closing
The last thing you say — a clear statement of what you are asking the jury to do and why justice requires it.

## Notes on Delivery
Key delivery guidance for this specific case type and jury situation.
WAITLIST

Runner beta coming — join the waitlist.

In-product execution isn't live yet. Leave your email and we'll let you know if the Runner beta opens.

How to use this prompt

1

1. Develop your case theory before using this prompt — the AI can help refine it, but you need a starting theory.

2

2. List the key evidence specifically — the evidence preview section is only as useful as the specificity of your exhibit and witness list.

3

3. Practice the delivery using the outline, not a script — fluency and authenticity matter more than word-for-word preparation.

Customization tips

Add 'This jury has been exposed to media coverage of the case — include an inoculation against specific pre-existing narratives' for high-profile matters.
Specify 'This is a bench trial — adapt tone and emphasis for a judge who will focus on legal issues, not emotional narrative.'
Add 'The theme phrase must resonate with [specific demographic or industry] jurors' to get theme suggestions tailored to your anticipated jury.
For defense openings, add 'Lead with the reasonable doubt standard and frame the entire opening around what the plaintiff has failed to prove.'

Sample output

Mar 2026Professional
OPENING STATEMENT OUTLINE — Defense (Harborview Commercial Center Contract Dispute) THEME: This case is about accountability. When a construction project runs over budget and over schedule, the party responsible for monitoring the schedule cannot turn around and blame the contractor for problems that the Owner's own management failures allowed to compound. STRUCTURE: I. THE PROMISE (2 minutes) - Introduce the project: Harborview Commercial Center — a significant commercial development - Introduce the contractor: [Client firm], a construction company with a 20-year track record of delivering complex commercial projects on schedule - The promise: they delivered exactly the work they were hired to do, in accordance with the contract II. THE PROBLEMS THAT WERE NOT THEIRS TO FIX (4 minutes) - The structural steel delivery delay — a supply chain disruption affecting the entire industry in mid-2025, not a contractor failure - The 14 change orders that sat unapproved in the Owner's office for an average of 31 days — delaying scope-critical work through no fault of the contractor - The July 15 email that the Owner's own project manager sent to his supervisor — in which he acknowledged, in his own words, that the project was running behind for reasons he attributed to supply chain and design scope changes III. WHAT THE EVIDENCE WILL SHOW (4 minutes) - The contract required the Owner's Representative to respond to change orders within 14 days. He did not. - The contract required the Owner to provide timely written notice of any claimed contractor default. The Owner waited 38 days after acknowledging the delay in writing to issue any such notice. - Delay caused by the Owner's own failure to respond cannot be charged to the contractor. IV. WHAT WE ARE ASKING (1 minute) - At the end of this trial, the evidence will compel a verdict for our client - The contractor performed. The Owner mismanaged. The Owner cannot now demand the contractor bear the cost of the Owner's own failures. - We will prove that to you. Note: Opening statements must be crafted in close coordination with trial counsel, client, and the full evidentiary record. This outline is a structural framework only.

Related prompts

Frequently asked questions

Read the Lawyers AI Guide
Professional Disclaimer

This AI-generated content is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Always consult a licensed attorney for specific legal matters.