Contractors

Construction Contract Risk Identifier

Identify high-risk contract provisions in a construction contract before signing. This prompt helps contractors systematically flag unfavorable terms, unusual liability exposures, and one-sided obligations — enabling informed negotiations and appropriate risk pricing before contract award.

This prompt reviews pasted construction contract provisions and categorizes identified risks across insurance and bonding requirements, indemnification breadth (including whether the contractor indemnifies the owner for the owner's own negligence), liquidated damages reasonableness, change order notice requirements and consequences of missing them, no-damage-for-delay clauses and their exceptions, and dispute resolution venue and timeline. Each risk is rated High / Medium / Low severity with a specific recommended negotiation action. This output is a pre-legal risk framework — high-value contracts and contracts with unusual indemnification or delay provisions require construction attorney review, and no-damage-for-delay enforceability varies by state. It is for general contractors and senior project managers evaluating contract terms before executing agreements on commercial, institutional, or public works projects.

Testedclaude-sonnet-4-6ValidatedMar 2026ScopeVerify against current contract documents and local regulati…TierAdvanced
AI Role
You are a senior construction project manager with expertise in construction con…
Models
Claude
Confidence
Advanced
Constraints
Verify against current contract documents and local regulations. This does not replace professional engineering judgment.
Contract risk analysis is not legal advice — high-value or high-risk contracts should be reviewed by a construction attorney before signing.
Many contract risks can be negotiated — raise concerns before signing, not after a dispute arises.
State-specific law may affect the enforceability of certain provisions — confirm enforceability with legal counsel for your jurisdiction.
Tested Models
claude-sonnet-4-6
Uncertainty
If contract provisions are described in general terms rather than provided in full, identify the highest-risk provision categories for this contract type and note that the specific provisions must be reviewed in full text for an accurate risk assessment.
Last updated
2026-05-28Published

The prompt

1,856 characters
contract-risk-identifier.prompt
You are a senior construction project manager with expertise in construction contract analysis, risk management, and contract negotiation.

Identify risks in the following construction contract:

Contract information:
- Contract type: [CONTRACT_TYPE — e.g., AIA A101, Owner-Drafted Lump Sum, GMP, Design-Build]
- Project type: [PROJECT_TYPE]
- Contract value: [VALUE]
- Owner type: [OWNER_TYPE — e.g., private developer, institutional, government]

Contract text to review:
[PASTE CONTRACT SECTIONS FOR REVIEW]

Specific concern areas:
[DESCRIBE ANY SPECIFIC CONCERNS OR UNUSUAL PROVISIONS]

Identify contract risks covering:

## Insurance and Bonding Requirements
Are the insurance and bonding requirements reasonable for this project size? Any unusual requirements (OCIP/CCIP, builder's risk, professional liability, pollution)?

## Indemnification Provisions
How broad is the indemnification obligation? Does the contractor indemnify the owner for the owner's own negligence? Any anti-indemnification statute considerations?

## Liquidated Damages
What are the liquidated damages provisions? Are the delay damages reasonable relative to the project size? Are there caps?

## Change Order Process
What is the change order notice requirement? Is it realistic? What are the consequences of missing the notice period?

## No-Damage-for-Delay
Does the contract include a no-damage-for-delay clause? What exceptions exist?

## Dispute Resolution
What is the dispute resolution process — litigation, arbitration, mediation? Where is venue? Are notice and filing deadlines practical?

## Unusual or One-Sided Provisions
Any other provisions that are unusually one-sided or impose obligations not typical for this contract type.

## Risk Rating and Negotiation Priority
For each identified risk: severity (High / Medium / Low) and recommended negotiation action.
WAITLIST

Runner beta coming — join the waitlist.

In-product execution isn't live yet. Leave your email and we'll let you know if the Runner beta opens.

How to use this prompt

1

1. Have your project manager and legal counsel review the risk report together — the project manager understands operational implications, the attorney understands legal enforceability.

2

2. Prioritize your negotiation of the top 3-5 risks — attempting to negotiate every unfavorable provision typically leads to rejection of all modifications. Focus on the provisions with the highest financial exposure.

3

3. Document all negotiated changes in written contract addenda — do not rely on verbal agreements about contract interpretation.

Customization tips

Add 'This is a public sector contract — identify any provisions that conflict with applicable state procurement law or public contract code provisions that may affect enforceability.'
For design-build contracts, add 'Review professional liability requirements — design-build contractors have expanded liability exposure for design errors that standard GC contracts do not contemplate.'
Append 'Evaluate the retainage provisions — high retainage rates (more than 10%) on large contracts can significantly impair cash flow; negotiate retainage reduction provisions after substantial completion.'

Sample output

Mar 2026Advanced
Contract Risk Assessment — Prime Contract Review Summary Project: [Project Name] Contract Type: [Lump Sum / Cost Plus / GMP / Design-Build] Owner: [Owner Name] Contract Version Reviewed: [Date of contract draft] Reviewer: [GC Name], Contracts Manager NOTE: This is an internal risk summary for preconstruction planning. Legal review by outside counsel is recommended before contract execution. IDENTIFIED CONTRACT RISKS: RISK 1 — LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AMOUNT (HIGH) Clause: Article 15, Delay and Liquidated Damages Risk: Liquidated damages are set at $[Amount] per calendar day. At the current project duration of [X] months, a 30-day delay would result in $[Amount] in liquidated damages. Assessment: Evaluate whether the LD rate is proportionate to the owner's actual damages (carrying costs, lost revenue). An excessive LD rate that functions as a penalty may be unenforceable, but enforceability requires expensive litigation to establish. Recommended action: Negotiate a cap on liquidated damages (typically 5-10% of contract value) and ensure the float management provisions protect against float consumption by the owner. RISK 2 — DIFFERING SITE CONDITIONS NOTICE PERIOD (MODERATE) Clause: Article 8, Site Conditions Risk: The contract requires written notice of a differing site condition within 3 calendar days of discovery. This is a short notice window that could result in waiver of additional compensation if the field team doesn't recognize and report conditions immediately. Recommended action: Establish a jobsite protocol requiring the superintendent to evaluate any unexpected subsurface or concealed condition as a potential DSC notice event. Provide a notice template to the field. RISK 3 — DESIGN REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY (MODERATE) Clause: Article 4, Contractor's Responsibilities Risk: The contract states the contractor "shall review and coordinate all construction documents and shall notify the owner of any discrepancies prior to commencing affected work." This language transfers some design review responsibility to the contractor and may limit differing conditions claims for errors that were observable during document review. Recommended action: Complete a thorough document review during preconstruction and issue formal written notifications for any identified discrepancies before contract execution or before work in affected areas begins. RISK 4 — PAYMENT TERMS AND RETAINAGE (MODERATE) Clause: Article 11, Payment Risk: Retainage is 10% throughout construction, reducing to 5% only at substantial completion. On a $[Amount] project, this represents significant working capital tied up for the project duration. Recommended action: Negotiate retainage reduction to 5% from the start, or negotiate a retainage release schedule tied to project milestones.

Related prompts

Frequently asked questions

Read the Contractors AI Guide
Professional Disclaimer

This AI-generated content is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not replace the professional judgment of licensed engineers or construction professionals. Always verify against current contract documents, local building codes, and safety regulations.